Copied to clipboard
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
。WPS官方版本下载对此有专业解读
Россиянам рассказали о гендерном разрыве зарплат в ИТ-отраслиSelecty: Менее половины женщин в ИТ-отрасли зарабатывают больше 200 тысяч рублей
（一）刻划、涂污或者以其他方式故意损坏国家保护的文物、名胜古迹的；
「我剛到這裡時，和人同房很難適應，天氣也相當惡劣。前一個月我都在想：『或許這不是適合我的工作。』」他坦言。